User login
Navigation
UK Space Links
- Airborne Engineering
- AspireSpace
- ASTRA
- AstroEngine.com
- BNSC
- Bristol Spaceplanes
- British Interplanetary Society
- Cambridge University Spaceflight
- ESERO-UK
- Excalibur Almaz Observer
- International Space Propulsion (ISP) Group
- LESEDS
- National Space Centre
- Orbiting Frog
- OurSpace new
- Project Icarus
- Purley Amateur Rocketry Society
- RAeS Space Links
- Reaction Engines Ltd.
- Rocket Corner
- Space.co.uk
- Spaceboosters.co.uk
- Space Newsfeed (Microcom Systems)
- Space Now
- SpacePod (RAL)
- Space Research Centre, Leicester
- SSTL Space Blog
- Starchaser Ltd.
- Stuart Clark
- UK Astronomers
- UK High Altitude Society
- United Kingdom Rocketry Association
- UK Rocket Man
- UKSEDS
- UK Space Directory
- Virgin Galactic
- Worldview Spaceflight
britishblogs.co.uk
British proposal for Space Station modules
Rocketeer — Fri, 04/01/2008 - 9:32pm
UK engineers and scientists - with the support of the British Interplanetary Society - are urging the UK government to fire the public's imagination and catch the vision for future space exploration by joining the International Space Station (ISS) programme.
A new contribution to the debate about how the UK should be involved in future space exploration is featured exclusively in the latest edition of Spaceflight magazine, the British Interplanetary Society’s monthly space publication.
Article author, Mark Hempsell, of Bristol University’s aerospace engineering department says: “Our proposal is for UK industry to design, build and launch a habitation module to enhance the everyday living facilities for astronauts.
“This proposal shows what Britain could still achieve at a relatively modest cost.”
As well as inspiring both the public and a new generation of young people, Hempsell claims such a project would significantly raise the UK's profile in the space-faring community around the world.
“It would allow UK scientists to use the Space Station for experiments, pave the way for British astronauts, and bring significant development and investment to the country's industry,” he said.
Hempsell argues that current options under consideration are very limited and would not allow the development of the full potential of the UK science or engineering communities.
“Such low-scale programmes are not a good basis for later participation in any international human lunar and Martian programmes because they have no engineering contribution,” he stated.
The British Habitation Extension Module (HEM) proposal would provide extra crew support facilities that would enable more effective crew use of the existing science laboratories.
“The design study illustrates that the many requirements for a late, but full, entry into the ISS programme can be met by a single system and is still a possible option for Britain,” explained Hempsell.
Two HEM modules would extend Node 3 and add around 100 m3 to the Space Station’s living areas.
The total cost of developing building and launching - on a Russian Souyuz/Fregat rocket - the two HEMs would be £530 million, spread over five or six years to 2015.
“It does now seem to have dawned on decision makers that the earlier exclusion of the UK from manned spaceflight in general and the ISS in particular was not in the national interest – at least from the science and motivational aspects,” says Hempsell.
“Eventually it may also dawn on them that the damage to the aerospace industrial base is also severely detrimental. The HEM study shows it is still possible to rectify this damage as well.”
Notes
The London-based British Interplanetary Society has an international membership of several thousand and was formed in 1933 to promote the exploration and utilisation of space.
In the 1930s, the BIS came up with plans for a manned lunar spacecraft, three decades before Apollo. In the late 1970s, it prepared a detailed design for a robot star-probe, Project Daedalus, to explore the system of Barnard's Star.
It publishes the monthly magazine Spaceflight and a technical periodical Journal of the British Interplanetary Society.
See also the Society’s ‘British human spaceflight campaign’ http://www.bis-spaceflight.com/sitesia.aspx/page/1191/l/en-gb
[Source: Campaign for UK Astronauts]
--------------------
Read my response: The Hempsell plan: Boldly Going the Wrong Way.
Search

Subscribe to the Rocketeers Twitter feed for instant updates!
BNSC Review comments
My comments on the BNSC Space Exploration Review (31 Jan 2009)
New British Space Age
Alt.Space News
- More on the fight against the House NASA bill
- John Spencer and the Space Tourism Society
- Briefs: SpaceX Falcon I plans; Asteroid missions;
- SAS: Short-Fuse Opportunity To Support NASA Reform
- Shuttle Discovery update
- Making dead worlds livable with microbial life
- STA Roundtable - Griffin, Pace, Payton & Dickman
- Picture of the Day - The Heart of the Whirlpool Galaxy
- Cal State Long Beach students build test stand for advanced liquid propellants
- Briefs: China mum on sat rendezvous; CarbonSat constellation
- SpaceX and EADS Astrium Announce Agreement
- Briefs: Chyba email; Bolden's remarks at Purdue; Vega in production
- EADS Astrium to market SpaceX Falcon 1 in Europe
- UK Space Agency needs continuous thrust
- Can We Spot Volcanoes on Alien Worlds?








Recent comments
5 days 16 hours ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 2 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
4 weeks 3 days ago
4 weeks 3 days ago
4 weeks 6 days ago
10 weeks 1 day ago
12 weeks 6 days ago