User login
Navigation
UK Space Links
- Airborne Engineering
- AspireSpace
- ASTRA
- AstroEngine.com
- Bristol Spaceplanes
- Britain in Space new
- British Interplanetary Society
- British Reaction Research
- BSTC Rocket Support Group new
- Cambridge University Spaceflight
- Celestial Mechanics
- ESERO-UK
- Excalibur Almaz Observer
- International Space Propulsion (ISP) Group
- LESEDS
- National Space Centre
- Orbiting Frog
- OurSpace
- Project Icarus
- Purley Amateur Rocketry Society
- RAeS Space Links
- RAL Space
- Reaction Engines Ltd.
- Rocket Corner
- Space.co.uk
- Spaceboosters.co.uk
- Space Kate | On a mission
- Space Newsfeed (Microcom Systems)
- Space Now
- SpacePod (RAL)
- Space Research Centre, Leicester
- SSTL Space Blog
- Spaceosaur
- Starchaser Ltd.
- Stuart Clark
- Tranquility Aerospace new
- UK Astronomers
- UK High Altitude Society
- United Kingdom Rocketry Association
- UK Rocket Man
- UKSEDS
- UK Space Directory
- Virgin Galactic
- Worldview Spaceflight
- YuriGagarin50
britishblogs.co.uk
Donate
Help support Rocketeers!
Falcon 9 launch success!
Rocketeer — Sat, 05/06/2010 - 10:23pm
Heartiest congratulations to Elon Musk and the SpaceX team for a stunningly successful maiden flight of the Falcon-9 launch vehicle and Dragon spacecraft demonstrator payload.
The vehicle was launched from LC40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station at 2:45EDT yesterday. Both stages appeared to function as designed, and placed the Dragon payload in an approximately 250km high orbit. Musk later reported that the rocket's second stage and dummy Dragon capsule hit "essentially a bullseye". The apogee, or high point, was about 1 percent higher than planned and the perigee, or low point, was 0.2 percent off.
Some minor technical issues were noticed, such as a slow roll of the upper stage starting at around T+6 minutes. The roll did not affect the trajectory performance. It also appears that the first stage broke up on re-entry, and was not able to be recovered. SpaceX will address these issues prior to the next mission, the first launch of a functional Dragon spacecraft for evaluation by NASA for ISS cargo resupply. That mission is currently scheduled for "this summer".
This is about the best Youtube video I've found of the launch so far:
More details and discussion:
- Falcon 9 booster rockets into orbit on dramatic first launch -- Spaceflight Now
- Falcon-9 Post-Flight Teleconference -- RLV News
- Shuttle successor succeeds in first test flight -- MSNBC
- SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket enjoys successful maiden flight -- BBC News
The Falcon-9 launch also caused a stir in Australia...
- Oh, those Falcon UFOs! -- Bad Astronomy
Update:
Some interesting nuggets from the post-flight telecon:
- SpaceX has spent $350-400M on Falcon 1 and 9, and another $150-200M on Dragon development, including NASA money and outside private investment.
- The launch escape system will be a 'pusher' attached to the base of the capsule, not a tractor (tower) system as with Apollo. The eventual intention is to use the LES for powered landings on land (as with Soyuz).
- Musk is in initial discussions with NASA on a public-private partnership for the development of a "super-heavy" lift vehicle. (Rocketeer: The current SpaceX test facilities at MacGregor in Texas are at least big enough to accommodate a launcher of Jarvis class).
- Musk will be announcing a number of major launch contracts shortly, including some which were signed before the F9 launch. (Rocketeer: There is speculation that this includes support for the Iridium NEXT telecoms constellation).
- SpaceX has been profitable for the past 3 years. Its current order book is worth $2.9 billion.
- Musk: It is my greatest hope that SpaceX will one day allow almost anyone to go to space.
Update II
If the stories about SpaceX's upcoming launch contracts are true, then there will be a cold wind blowing through the offices of ULA and Arianespace right about now. It is blatantly obvious that current large European aerospace contractors cannot compete with SpaceX on price (case in point: the cost of the Jules Verne ATV was more than twice as much as the entire SpaceX development programme: ground facilities, launchers and spacecraft).
Someone needs to lead development of European cheap access to space, to meet the competitive challenge of SpaceX.
It might as well be us.
Search

Subscribe to the Rocketeers Twitter feed for instant updates!
BNSC Review comments
My comments on the BNSC Space Exploration Review (31 Jan 2009)
New British Space Age
Alt.Space News
- Software testing sets pace of Dragon launch preparations
- Heavy Ions Killed Mars Probe – Investigators
- Sierra Nevada Delivers Flight Test Vehicle Structure
- NASA Receives Second Highest Number Of Astronaut Applications
- Station Crew Preps for Spacewalk
- Mars Express reveals wind-blown deposits on Mars
- Briefs: Commercial space steps; Masten test pict
- Briefs: Dennis Wingo interview; Phoney Moon base costs
- McCain presses USAF on ULA block buy
- Remotely contour crafting a lunar base
- Briefs: UP Aerospace April launch; Next STIG to 120km; Jon Goff, pt. 2
- Commercial spaceflight regs: moratorium & review
- Briefs: Romney space shots at Newt; Not "Lunar-cy"; Romney & Eric Anderson
- Virgin Galactic update on WK2/SS2
- Armadillo Aerospace launches their third "STIG-A" rocket from Spaceport America
Recent comments
- I notice that the entry to
2 weeks 1 day ago - SNC Dreamchaser
3 weeks 4 days ago - Whilst you briefly mentioned
5 weeks 1 day ago - satellite 'life extension'
6 weeks 16 hours ago - Send Victoria Holt In To Space
8 weeks 1 day ago - Vote for Victoria Holt from Bath
8 weeks 1 day ago - or in this case directly from
12 weeks 1 day ago - Great :-)
12 weeks 1 day ago - Works for me. Try this:
12 weeks 2 days ago - I don't know if it is it just
12 weeks 2 days ago








SpaceX Falcon9 Launch
james.grainger — Mon, 07/06/2010 - 10:03amWell its about time that the launch industry got a reality check and if SpaceX can indeed deliver on its promises regarding launch costs then all the better. This is what is needed to revitalise the industry and introduce a good dose of healthy competition!
The UK should jump on this opportunity to develop low cost space launch technology - increase investment in Reaction Engines for a start and also help spur other space startups - especially those looking to reduce launch costs - Key factor in my opinion is reusability.
Reusability is key in the
Rocketeer — Mon, 07/06/2010 - 3:22pmReusability is key in the medium to long term. What's key now in my opinion is incremental development, with revenue-generating potential at each step.